How Did We Get So Dark? (studio album) by Royal Blood
Top albums of 2017 (
Price
Royal Blood bestography
How Did We Get So Dark? is ranked 2nd best out of 4 albums by Royal Blood on BestEverAlbums.com.
The best album by Royal Blood is Royal Blood which is ranked number 944 in the list of all-time albums with a total rank score of 1,895.
Upcoming concerts
Listen to How Did We Get So Dark? on YouTube
How Did We Get So Dark? track list
The tracks on this album have an average rating of 81 out of 100 (all tracks have been rated).
1
How Did We Get So Dark? rankings
Latest 20 charts that this album appears in:
PAPPITUFO
Patman360
Purplepash
rambleon80
neilgee
videoheadcleanerYou can include this album in your own chart from the My Charts page!
How Did We Get So Dark? collection
Showing latest 20 members who have this album in their collection | Show all 40 members
How Did We Get So Dark? ratings
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this album. | Show all 157 ratings for this album.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Album ratings | Avg. album rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
95/100  | 09/17/2024 19:46 | VINYLGUY7788 | | 88/100 |
100/100 | 06/19/2024 20:33 | POWER18 | | 97/100 |
80/100 | 02/05/2024 18:19 | Svelte8 | | 73/100 |
60/100 | 02/04/2024 23:54 | asimpkins | | 69/100 |
95/100 | 01/01/2024 18:59 | tiger555 | | 93/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)
This album has a Bayesian average rating of 73.1/100, a mean average of 72.7/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 73.2/100. The standard deviation for this album is 14.4.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to leave a rating
How Did We Get So Dark? favourites
Showing all 12 members who have added this album as a favourite
How Did We Get So Dark? comments
Showing all 9 comments |
Most Helpful First | Newest First | Maximum Rated First |
Longest Comments First
(Only showing comments with -2 votes or higher. You can alter this threshold from your profile page. Manage Profile)
A solid album continuing on the good work of their debut, without the same number of top class tracks. My favourites are Don't Tell, Hook Line Sinker, I Only Lie When I Love You and Hole In Your Heart.
teague 08/27/2021 17:40
Arctic Monkeys with balls. I've seen these guys and they tear down the house.
A bit less valuable with respect to the previous work, simply because they didn't change practically anything in their proposal. The album is however enjoyable, energic, still fresh, despite of all
I really like this album. On first listen, it was "Oh this is not as good as their first album", but on repeated listens I have really got into this album.
RoundTheBend 12/16/2017 21:46
Probably deserves more like a 75 rating, but I'm a sucker for riff rock and the fact it's just a bassist with an octave pedal is pretty damn cool too (as a bassist). Nothing amazing musically, but definitely a fun listen of catchy riffs.
a brilliant follow up - it couldve gone so south after such a glorious debut album
but it is excellent, consistant and addictive
i will be honest - i did not like it on the first listen but absolutely love it now
the title track is very "Supergrass" - but thats not a bad thing in this case
great stuff
I actually really like this new album just as much as I like the first one, but I think you have to keep listening to it over and over to really understand the potential of the record. This is definitely a new direction for the duo because they are introducing a newer, more innovative side to them as they combine both harder and softer songs into the album. It's definitely more poppy than their debut record rather than just kick in the face garage/blues rock. They really expand their sound with this one and I think if you keep listening to it every now and then, you will start to enjoy it as much as I do.
Graeme2 06/23/2017 18:49
Not sure about the radiohead comparison, the obvious one is qotsa. Think I liked it a little bit more than the first. Nice enough pop rock.
DeusExMackia 06/18/2017 15:40
The tricky second album for Royal Blood; they get it right a lot of the time here, but there's also plenty of iffy moments. It never quite gets anywhere, and feels more like a collection of material cut from their excellent debut.
There's still promise here though; their sound is more developed and the experimentations of their style are certainly intriguing (with many songs feeling more pop-esque and some apparently taking inspiration from Bends-era Radiohead structurally and vocally).
It just wasn't enough development for my taste, and the result was a record that lost its excitement soon after it began. It's good, but not really good enough to be considered a worthy follow-up.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to add a comment
Your feedback for How Did We Get So Dark?
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.