The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time by Rolling Stone (2020)
Rolling Stone is an American monthly magazine that focuses on music, politics, and popular culture. It was founded in San Francisco, California. These are their best albums of all time. "The classics are still the classics, but the canon keeps getting bigger and better".
(Official website: https://www.rollingstone.com | Original URL Warning: The address at the original source was valid at the time the chart was added, but may have changed afterwards. )
There are 22 comments for this chart from BestEverAlbums.com members and The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time has an average rating of 56 out of 100 (from 55 votes). Please log in or register to leave a comment or assign a rating.
View the complete list of 54,000 charts on BestEverAlbums.com from The Charts page.
Don't agree with this chart? Create your own from the My Charts page!
The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time composition
Decade | Albums | % | |
---|---|---|---|
1930s | 0 | 0% | |
1940s | 0 | 0% | |
1950s | 1 | 1% | |
1960s | 22 | 22% | |
1970s | 32 | 32% | |
1980s | 14 | 14% | |
1990s | 18 | 18% | |
2000s | 6 | 6% | |
2010s | 7 | 7% | |
2020s | 0 | 0% |
Artist | Albums | % | |
---|---|---|---|
|
|||
The Beatles | 5 | 5% | |
Stevie Wonder | 3 | 3% | |
The Jimi Hendrix Experience | 3 | 3% | |
Bob Dylan | 3 | 3% | |
David Bowie | 3 | 3% | |
Michael Jackson | 2 | 2% | |
Aretha Franklin | 2 | 2% | |
Show all |
The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time ratings
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this chart. | Show all 55 ratings for this chart.
Rating | Date updated | Member | Chart ratings | Avg. chart rating |
---|---|---|---|---|
04/12/2023 18:37 | chavaloricardin | 15 | 83/100 | |
11/09/2022 17:13 | peate754 | 31 | 81/100 | |
10/15/2022 10:41 | animals0809 | 57 | 93/100 | |
09/27/2022 21:43 | Phileas | 6 | 35/100 | |
09/26/2022 12:19 | Yannick1398 | 6 | 97/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some charts can have several thousand ratings)
This chart has a Bayesian average rating of 56.4/100, a mean average of 50.5/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 52.4/100. The standard deviation for this chart is 26.8.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to leave a rating
The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time favourites
Please log in or register if you want to be able to add a favourite
The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time comments
Showing latest 10 comments | Show all 22 comments |
Most Helpful First | Newest First | Maximum Rated First |
Longest Comments First
(Only showing comments with -2 votes or higher. You can alter this threshold from your profile page. Manage Profile)
I thought the pick for number one, while not my favourite, is as great as can be. And the presence of rap albums in the top spots is totally justified as it is the music of the times. I'm too ignorant on the subject to pretend to know which rap albums are great. What I found issue with is the ranking of the music I know about, relative to one another. In my opinion they had it almost upside down.
I love over 80% of these but this list doesn't seem honest. How can someone appreciate Beatles/Floyd/Stones/Radiohead and rank Revolver at 11? Dark Side Of The Moon at 55???? I seriously don't believe that anyone can even be capable of appreciating them and ranking them so low. They don't even have Wish You Were Here or In Rainbows in the top 100.... WOW. I had to go back and forth through it like 4 times to confirm no Wish You Were Here and I was LITERALLY reeling when I saw Dark Side Of The Moon at 55.
That being said, the sentiment that this is "part of a forced left wing agenda" is stupid. This is the mindset of those people, "This list by the staff of a magazine is part of A DEMOCRAT [sic] PLOT." Seriously, lmfao. You might think this list is stupid and it just might be, but do you know what's dumber? I'll give you 3 guesses.
It's really hard to rank rap against rock and it's totally fair to just alternate in a list like this: rap, rock, rap, rock, rap, rock.... At work I play full albums and personally prefer to change genres every album - I've probably gone entire days where every album I played was actually on this very list. It's not "woke" or "political" to put a rap album amidst a bunch of incomparable rock albums that you personally love. What else are you going to do when you love both rap and rock, listen to them about as often as each other, and can't compare them? WTF else are you going to do?
To think that you'd have to be "forcing" black artists' albums on this list is insulting and proves that you're the racist that people tell you that you are. You actually thought that this couldn't be anyone's taste? That it MUST be forced, b/c that's the only way black artists could get ranked so highly? You're sick and delusional. Oh well, I'm not getting through to any of you. There's a reason the average conservative IQ is 8 points lower.
Back on topic. The list isn't THAT bad. All of the albums on it that I know are among not only my favorites, but the favs of multiple people I know. This list's only crime is that the order is often bewildering.
What's Going On? No really, what is going on?
Propaganda.
zzzzzz
The worst list I’ve ever seen. Too political. You can’t apply diversity to quality in art. Part of the forced left wing agenda
They managed to sneak a contemporary black female’s album into the top ten. But at the expense of Kind of Blue, and A Love Supreme, and a host of others. Sorry Miles and co. The quota was full. Shame on you, Rolling Stone. Let’s see if as many people in 50 years time are still listening to the miseducation of whatserface as there are people still buying copies of Kind of Blue today.
We all knew the list was about to suck when we saw that Funeral was number 500. So, they met expectations
Better than the 2012 list, but not by much.
Too political... Lauryn Hill in the top 10 ... nope.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to add a comment
Your feedback for The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.
Member Levels | |
---|---|
colabunga | Level 3 |
openthegates | Level 2 |
New levels achieved over the last 7 days. Well done to all :) |